The Great AI Coding Disillusionment: When Tools Become Obstacles

In partnership with

This week, a wave of frustration swept through the AI no-code community as the honeymoon phase with AI coding tools came to an abrupt end.

From Copilot's reliability issues to Cursor's misleading student offers, and the growing realization that LLMs might be making us worse coders — not better ones — we're witnessing what might be the Great AI Coding Disillusionment.

Find out why 1M+ professionals read Superhuman AI daily.

In 2 years you will be working for AI

Or an AI will be working for you

Here's how you can future-proof yourself:

1. Join the Superhuman AI newsletter – read by 1M+ people at top companies

2. Master AI tools, tutorials, and news in just 3 minutes a day

3. Become 10X more productive using AI

Join 1,000,000+ pros at companies like Google, Meta, and Amazon that are using AI to get ahead.

Sign up and start learning AI

Here's what's happening — and what you can do about it:

🤖 Copilot's Broken Promises (And Growing Limitations)

GitHub Copilot was supposed to be our pair programmer from the future. Instead, many users report it's becoming more restrictive and less helpful with each update.

One developer on Reddit didn't mince words:

Meanwhile, GitHub quietly added new usage throttling that kicks in when you need it most:

✅ Action:

• Track your productivity with and without Copilot for a week — many users report they're actually faster without it

• Use Copilot only for boilerplate code and documentation, not logic-heavy sections

• Keep a personal snippet library as backup for when AI tools inevitably fail

🎓 Cursor's "Free for Students" Bait-and-Switch Cursor made headlines with their "Forever Free for Students" program — until students discovered what "free" actually meant.

The promised unlimited access quickly transformed into:

• 500 fast premium requests per month

• No access to the latest models without additional charges

• Limited to specific universities in select countries

According to Cursor's own documentation:

✅ Action:

• If you're a student, document your usage before hitting limits and contact support with screenshots

• Educators: warn students about these limitations before assigning projects

• Always export your code regularly — some users report being locked out of their own projects when limits hit

⚠️ The LLM Coding Competence Myth 

The uncomfortable truth is emerging: LLMs are far less competent at coding than their marketing suggests.

A study from Stanford University found that developers using AI-powered coding assistants are more likely to introduce security vulnerabilities compared to those coding without AI assistance:

One senior developer at a Fortune 500 company shared:

✅ Action:

• Never deploy AI-generated code without human review — especially for authentication or data handling

• Run static analysis tools on all AI-generated code

• Challenge yourself: try solving problems without AI first, then compare your solution

🧠 The Return to Human Problem-Solving

A surprising counter-movement is gaining traction: developers deliberately stepping away from AI tools to reclaim their problem-solving skills.

The #CodeWithoutAI movement has been gaining momentum on social media platforms, with developers sharing how they're rediscovering the joy of solving problems themselves.

According to a recent analysis of coding trends:

✅ Action:

• Try a "No AI Wednesday" in your workflow to maintain your core skills

• When using AI tools, write pseudocode first to maintain your logical thinking

• Join coding communities that focus on fundamentals rather than prompt engineering

🔍 Ethical Implications of AI Coding Dependence

Beyond practical concerns, the ethical questions around AI coding tools are becoming impossible to ignore.

Computer science professors report alarming trends:

• Students who can't debug code they didn't write themselves

• Declining understanding of fundamental algorithms

• Over-reliance on AI for problem decomposition

As noted in a recent educational technology report:

✅ Action:

• If you manage a team, implement "explain your code" sessions where developers must walk through their logic

• For personal growth, try implementing classic algorithms from scratch without AI assistance

• When learning, use AI to explain concepts rather than write code for you

🔧 Quick Fixes, Warnings, & Watchouts

Fix this now: If you've become dependent on AI coding tools, start a "code detox" by tackling small projects completely on your own. Many developers report this quickly rebuilds atrophied skills.

Watch out for this: AI tools that claim to "understand your codebase" — most are simply pattern-matching and can introduce subtle, hard-to-detect bugs when they misunderstand your architecture.

Avoid this combo: Copilot + untested production code + tight deadlines = The Technical Debt Accelerator™. Not recommended for career longevity.

📬 What You Can Do Right Now

✅ Audit your AI tool usage and identify which tasks you've become dependent on them for.

❌ Don't let AI tools make architectural decisions — they lack the context for long-term maintenance.

📤 Forward this email to anyone questioning their relationship with AI coding tools.

Until next week, remember that the best tool in your arsenal is still the one between your ears.

— AI No-Code Rescue